An advisory report and background paper issued by the Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council (PFRCC) warn that salmon conservation risks are increasing due to budget and program cuts in Fisheries & Oceans Canada.
Fisheries Decisions Being Made Without Essential Salmon Stock Information
VANCOUVER, February 6, 2004 - The Council found that
the reductions in assessment budgets and survey coverage of Pacific
salmon are occurring just when better data are urgently needed for
salmon management and decision-making, and for continuity of long-term
scientific knowledge.
The Council's report entitled Advisory: Salmon Conservation
Challenges in BC With Particular Reference to Central and North Coast
(443 KB Adobe Acrobat PDF) also cited positive indicators of better
spawning results in much of the region, mainly related to reduced
fishing pressure and improved marine survival conditions. It went on to
identify instances where reductions in fish monitoring and assessment
are leading to troubling knowledge gaps about the status of stocks.
A detailed background paper by the Council's science advisor, Dr.
Brian Riddell, was also issued with the advisory. Entitled Pacific
Salmon Resources in Central and North Coast British Columbia (1.7 MB
Adobe Acrobat PDF), the background paper provides an extensive review
of each of the region's salmon species and their unique conditions and
life histories.
The Council's Advisory pointed out that without sufficient
science-based information, sound management decisions for the resource
cannot be made with confidence and levels of sustainable fishing cannot
be determined. The 1999 Pacific Salmon Treaty, the new Species at Risk
Act and Canada's relationship with its First Nations all demand better
quality data on salmon stocks. Cutbacks to the assessment and
monitoring programs of Fisheries & Oceans Canada in these
circumstances are causing a loss of public confidence in the federal
government's commitment to protect Pacific salmon.
"Given the breadth of issues facing the management of Pacific
salmon stocks, information and data are more crucial now than ever
before," said the Honourable John Fraser, Chairman of the PFRCC.
"Reliable monitoring and reporting on naturally-produced Pacific salmon
needs to be a top priority. Salmon conservation relies upon it."
The Council strongly feels that there needs to be an explicit and
sustained commitment of funds for a core assessment framework. Without
this commitment, the value of the data painstakingly collected over the
years will be seriously degraded.
The background paper identified five specific issues that Fisheries & Oceans Canada will need to address:
* A concerted assessment of the smaller sockeye lake populations
should take place during the next few years and study the genetic
structure of these stocks in order to define the conservation units for
sockeye salmon.
* Each chum population in the region should be designated by run
timing, and genetic variation between summer and fall chums should be
assessed. Fisheries & Oceans Canada should establish some
quantitative capacity to assess summer chum salmon.
* The indicator stock programs for coho and chinook salmon are
essential to evaluate changes in marine survival rates and fishery
impacts over time. They provide the only means to assess the causes of
changes in coho and chinook production and to provide verification for
the visual escapement surveys. There are no indicator stocks for coho
and chinook salmon in some areas of central and northern BC.
* Fisheries & Oceans Canada should establish an assessment
framework for each salmon species, and consider how these salmon
"stocks" may be accounted for under the Canadian Species at Risk Act.
* There should be a thorough review of the major hatchery programs,
addressing the questions of whether or not they are providing the
expected or desired benefits, and how they could be modified to aid
other populations, assessment programs, or uses. These evaluations
should involve the local communities.
The Council urges that any contemplated budgetary cutbacks to core
salmon assessment programs and sciences not be disproportionately
larger than reductions in other program areas. Any reductions should
not create or worsen conservation risks, and the groups that would be
affected by any such decisions should be consulted first.
Public confidence and trust is at stake if stock assessment efforts
are further reduced. This core information is critical to conserve
salmon, maintain social, cultural, and economic benefits from the
resource, and restore public credibility in the government's
determination to protect wild salmon.
The Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council is an
independent source of information and advice to the fisheries ministers
of Canada and British Columbia and to the Canadian public.
For more information, contact:
Kevin Langlands
Media Liaison
250-792-1599
Dr. Brian Riddell
Science Advisor
250-758-0894
Related Reports:
Pacific Salmon Resources in Central and North Coast British Columbia