Vancouver, May 12, 2003 - The federal and BC
governments have agreed to set up a Salmon Aquaculture Forum. As the
news release issued earlier this month stated, Ministers Thibault and
van Dongen have asked me to assist in the process of bringing together
everyone who should be involved. The founding of the Forum is an
unprecedented effort by both levels of government to improve the
dialogue and seek constructive solutions to controversies associated
with salmon aquaculture.
The Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council is privileged
to take on this task in the Forum's initial phase. We had proposed the
creation of this innovative organization earlier this year to fulfill
the need for a process to build public consensus and identify future
practical options in salmon aquaculture. The Council's role will be
limited to acting as a catalyst in the formulation and planning stage
during the next three months.
The Forum is meant to provide a fresh start to overcome the deep
suspicion and widespread lack of trust that has permeated all aspects
of the salmon aquaculture debates. It is intended to help build public
confidence that all stakeholders and First Nations participants are
willing to contribute to finding practical solutions.
The governments recognize that it is critical that the people who
are going to be part of the process be part of the design of the
process. The stakeholders, First Nations and interested British
Columbians will have a role in determining who will ultimately
facilitate and assist in building an effective new entity.
In broad terms, I have been given a mandate to:
1. engage the array of stakeholders and First Nations in the
process of formulating and becoming committed to a Salmon Aquaculture
Forum; and
2. identify how the stakeholders and aboriginal organizations
could work most productively towards common objectives, and what the
ground rules should be.
Therefore, I will be developing preliminary terms of reference for
the Forum. It is recognized that, as the Forum evolves, it should take
on progressively greater roles. The initial focus should be identified
in terms of what is desirable and achievable within the current
context.
I will be proceeding in the following steps:
1. Call for stakeholder, First Nations and public suggestions on
what principles would drive an effective Forum, and invite comment
through written submissions, email responses through the Council
website, and informal discussions.
2. Hold a series of interviews and bilateral discussions with key
stakeholder groups, individuals, and First Nations organizations,
including a series of small, informal roundtable discussions with
selected stakeholders to determine and explore appropriate approaches
to establish initial Forum representation and commitments to
participate.
3. Production of a two part public discussion paper by mid August.
Part One would identify best practices for establishing processes with
similar goals as the proposed Forum, with particular attention to
advisory groups dealing with aquaculture and natural resource issues in
Canada and other countries. In addition, the role of science and its
contribution to conflict resolution in resource issues will also be
considered.
Part Two would outline the findings of the public suggestions,
interviews, and roundtables, for the purpose of generating comment and
alternatives. It would propose terms of reference for a Salmon
Aquaculture Forum, recommend on the membership, provide a candid
appraisal of the commitments that would be required to make the
organization useful, effective and sustainable in the longterm, and
produce a consensus based business plan to guide implementation.
4. Production of a briefing note to federal and provincial ministers on:
Forum options and structures in light of the cross jurisdictional
nature of aquaculture, First Nations issues, and the wide range of
interested parties wishing to be involved;
Funding options to cover the costs of an on going Forum;
The need for local area management structures that include First Nations and stakeholder participation; and,
Identifying an interim group of facilitators and advisors who would manage the implementation phase of the Forum.
The four step approach would lead to the public discussion paper in
August and a briefing note to federal and provincial ministers with
recommendations for implementation. We expect that the project will
take about 14 weeks.
I have asked Ken Beeson, a consultant and policy adviser to the
Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council, to work closely with
me to conduct interviews and obtain an array of perspectives on how the
Forum should be organized and work. We have already put forward our
suggestion that the Forum should be transparent, open and approachable.
It should have a capacity for the consideration of research and
encourage studies that expand our scientific knowledge. It needs to be
independent and have full First Nations involvement.
We have anticipated a healthy public skepticism about the possible
effectiveness of the Forum and the sincerity of some of those who might
be involved. The public discussions about salmon aquaculture have too
often been highly emotional, bitter and personalized. In our recent
Advisory, we explained:
"The debates around wild salmon and aquaculture generally
reflect a lack of trust and a perceived unwillingness on all sides to
engage in meaningful dialogue. In the view of the Council, a change of
attitude and strategy by government officials and stakeholders is an
essential first step towards rebuilding common ground in which both
environmental and commercial interests can be frankly but
constructively discussed and accommodated".
Our intention is to help create an innovative way to channel the
public concern and interest into a productive effort. We reiterate the
reason for this Forum: "In the view of the Council, the problems
of aquaculture and wild salmon are not impossible to address. However,
an impasse has been reached in the debates on the significant matters
of public concern. The problems of aquaculture require new ideas,
public consensus and creative solutions that are not now being
generated by governments and stakeholders within the existing
institutions and framework for discussing the future of wild salmon and
aquaculture".
We have not taken on this project with any illusions about the
challenges involved in this task. It will require the sincerity and
good will of the governments, stakeholders and First Nations to make a
Salmon Aquaculture Forum workable and sustainable.
Our Council is willing to risk the possibility of failing at this
effort because we believe that decisions in the near future about wild
salmon and aquaculture are so crucial to the environmental and economic
prospects of British Columbia. We make no apologies for being
considered idealistic in our pursuit of this objective.
For more information, contact:
John Paul Fraser
Media Liaison Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council
604-775-5621
fraser@fish.bc.ca